Organizational Performance Management Essay Example for Free

Organizational Performance Management Essay Each Learning Team member must select a different type of health care organization to study for the purpose of this group assignment. You are encouraged to select a different type of organization from the one chosen in the Week Three individual assignment but it’s not necessary. Group members compare their chosen organizations to complete the table and paper. Resources: Organizational Performance Management Table and Paper Grading Criteria and University of Phoenix Material: Organizational Performance Management Table Conduct a group discussion and address the following points: Â · Summarize the type of health care organization you selected. Â · Compare the main regulatory and accreditation standards that apply to each type of organization and identify standards that apply broadly to most or all types of health care organizations. Â · Discuss the influence of regulatory and accreditation standards on performance-management systems. Â · Discuss how the performance-management systems affect risk and quality management in each type of organization. Â · Identify key areas in the organization that will have direct responsibility for carrying out the day-to-day responsibilities associated with the regulations or standards. Â · Identify other areas in the organization that will be indirectly affected by the regulations or standards. Â · Outline what oversight activities you could use to ensure that the regulatory and accreditation requirements are being implemented and are achieving the desired results. Collaborate to write a 1,400- to 1,750-word paper in which you address the following points: Â · Address the similarities and differences among the types of organizations. Â · Follow the link Now for full guide https://bitly.com/1DNjhaY Look into attending community college for your first year or two. By taking your basic core studies at a community college, you can save a considerable amount of money. You can then transfer all of your credits to a university of your choice. If the cost of a 4-year degree is beyond what you can afford, this is a good option. General Questions General General Questions Each Learning Team member must select a different type of health care organization to study for the purpose of this group assignment. You are encouraged to select a different type of organization from the one chosen in the Week Three individual assignment but it’s not necessary. Group members compare their chosen organizations to complete the table and paper. Resources: Organizational Performance Management Table and Paper Grading Criteria and University of Phoenix Material: Organizational Performance Management Table Conduct a group discussion and address the following points: Â · Summarize the type of health care organization you selected. Â · Compare the main regulatory and accreditation standards that apply to each type of organization and identify standards that apply broadly to most or all types of health care organizations. Â · Discuss the influence of regulatory and accreditation standards on performance-management systems. Â · Discuss how the performance-management systems affect risk and quality management in each type of organization. Â · Identify key areas in the organization that will have direct responsibility for carrying out the day-to-day responsibilities associated with the regulations or standards. Â · Identify other areas in the organization that will be indirectly affected by the regulations or standards. Â · Outline what oversight activities you could use to ensure that the regulatory and accreditation requirements are being implemented and are achieving the desired results. Collaborate to write a 1,400- to 1,750-word paper in which you address the following points: Â · Address the similarities and differences among the types of organizations. Â · Propose how each organization will monitor performance, achieve regulatory and accreditation compliance, and improve overall organizational performance.

The Admirable Qualities in Puritans Illustrated by Anne Bradstreet and Cotton Mather :: essays research papers

According to Mrs. Anne Bradstreet and Mr. Cotton Mather, I think Puritans have some admirable qualities, such as the relationship with the family - especially Mrs. Bradstreet with her husband, and she was trying hard to be a great mother. In addition, Mr. Mather was strong and powerful person even though his life was darkened by disappointment and tragedy. He tried hard to make a difference for his life. From Mrs. Bradstreet's poem - 'To My Dear and Loving Husband', she had a really good relationship with her husband. Her husband and she loved each others a lot, you can tell from 'If ever two were one, then surely we. If ever man were loved by wife, then thee' (To My Dear and Loving Husband, Anne Bradstreet, P. 263). In addition, she missed her husband when he went to work for public employment and she wanted him to come home. In ?A Letter to Her Husband, Absent upon Public Employment?, she wrote she missed her husband and she could see him in her head, my heart, my eyes, my life and ever more. She would be home and welcome him when he comes back (A Letter to Her Husband, Absent upon Public Employment, Bradstreet, P. 264). In another poem, she showed that she could not live without her husband. She wrote she wanted her husband and her lived in one house, like a couple of mullets living in one river until the die (Another [Letter to Her Husband, Absent upon Public Employment], Bradstreet, P.264). I think Mrs. Bradstreet loved her children more than herself even though when her children grew up and left her alone. In her poem, she wrote that she had eight birds - which were her eight children, after they grew up they left one by one and live with their partner. However, she must nurse them to grow up even though she had to take care of them twenty-four hours by seven days (In Reference to her Children, 23 June, 1659, Bradstreet, P. 264). She would not let her children get hurt by any chance, she would protect them forever. In the poem, she wrote that I bred you with my pain, I fed you with all my care because I wanted to keep you soft and warm. I opened my wings to protect you off from harm.

Characterization of Christabel

The Characterization of Christabel Critics from around the world have put insight into the many ways that â€Å"[t]he lovely lady, Christabel† can be characterized (Coleridge 23). Samuel Taylor Coleridge uses many words to describe Christabel, but with literary analysis of â€Å"Christabel,† provided by scholars, she can be characterized at a deeper level than the way she is described in the text of the poem. Her description plays role in allowing the reader to relate with her quickly and be able to learn more about Christabel as the poem continues.Deeper meaning to her characterization is portrayed throughout the plot of the poem as she is entranced and deceived by Geraldine. Even though the poem is incomplete, a thorough understanding of Christabel’s character can be derived from what Coleridge has completed essay writer for you. The characterization of Christabel is explained through Christianity, â€Å"the fall of innocence† and purity (Radley 69), and â€Å"the transition from â€Å"innocence† to â€Å"experience† (Harding 40). † Christianity plays a major role throughout the poem to characterize Christabel. â€Å"Christabel herself personifies moral innocence. She â€Å"appears well-intentioned, virginal, and naive† (Ulmer 378). These qualities go along with those of a Christian who has not been exposed to sin and still has purity. â€Å"Christabel is repeatedly characterized â€Å"as a sinless child†¦ â€Å"Christabel suffers innocently, like Christ [;]† her â€Å"beauty has a particular innocence about it, being associated with the beauty of Christ† (qtd. in Ulmer 378). Christabel is seen as pure and sinless on the surface, but as the poem continues the perception of her innocence shifts toward her permitting sin to come into her life. Cooper contends that â€Å"physical evil, no matter how supernatural its source, cannot touch Christabel’s soul unless she consents to it†Ã¢â‚¬  (qtd. in Ulmer 379). At the oak tree Geraldine deceives Christabel and causes her to question her faith and give in to sin. Ulmer reports that â€Å"Christabel’s encounter with Geraldine thus reenacts the Fall, with the complicities of that encounter signifying the girl’s subjection to Original Sin† (381). After Christabel’s night time encounter with Geraldine, she â€Å"finds Geraldine even more beautiful than the night before.Convinced that her evening with Geraldine was sinful, Christabel prays for redemption† (Overview: â€Å"Christabel†). Like the serpent in The Garden of Eden, Geraldine tricks Christabel into sin and starts the downfall of Christabel’s perceived innocence and purity, but her guilt eventually overcomes sin. The Christian character upheld by Christabel prevails and Geraldine’s spell is overcome. In Addition to Christianity and the introduction to sin playing a role in the characterization o f Christabel, â€Å"the fall of [her] innocence† adds emphasis as well (Radley 69).According to Radley, â€Å"Christabel† lines 279-331, â€Å"the bedchamber scene, begins by presenting a picture of Christabel, in all her innocence, praying in the wood. This image is recapitulated for the reader to [emphasize her] innocence before the fall† (71). Christabel has a hold on her sexual innocence up to this point in the poem. Geraldine has been able to quickly expose her to sexual evil and Christabel has not contested participation. The morning after the bedchamber encounter â€Å"Geraldine appears more beautiful and more voluptuous† (Radley 71). Christabel quickly realizes her sin saying â€Å"Sure I have sinned! (Coleridge 381). She has now been awakened to sexual knowledge and has been directly â€Å"affected by her contact with evil† (Radley 72). Radley explains â€Å"a kind of allegory of the bed chamber is here enacted† out of Bracyâ€℠¢s dream of a snake strangling a dove, the story of Adam and Eve (73-74). Christabel is exposed to sexual knowledge, similarly to how Adam and Eve notice their nudity once they eat the forbidden fruit. â€Å"The fall of [Christabel’s] innocence† is due to an attraction and entrancement of Geraldine leading to the exposure to â€Å"a world of sin† (Coleridge 673).The loss of Christabel’s purity and exposure to sin builds up to â€Å"the transition from â€Å"innocence† to â€Å"experience†Ã¢â‚¬  (Harding 40). The poem explains Christabel has beautiful and innocent when she is introduced, but she is quickly corrupted by evil resulting in a completely different person. According to Mulvihill, â€Å"Christabel has been abandoned to possible danger by virtue of a number of circumstances, including her own naively sympathetic nature† (260). This dangerous characteristic is easily recognized by Geraldine and taken advantage of.Christabelâ €™s sympathetic nature attracts Geraldine, allowing the seduction of Christabel to take place (Mulvihill 260,264). Christabel’s failure â€Å"to read the warning signs—Geraldine’s refusal to pray, the tongue of light in the dying fire (Coleridge 142,159)—Christabel permits herself to accept Geraldine† (Harding 49). The warning signs never occur to Christabel because she has never been exposed to such evil in her life. â€Å"She is orphaned by the departure of a certain kind of spirituality that is associated with womanhood and motherhood.This deprivation leaves her vulnerable to the irruption of the tyrannous Geraldine† (Harding 47). Harding Explains, She finds a mother figure in Geraldine â€Å"following Christabel’s seduction by Geraldine and the fever-like crisis of the mysterious spell, Geraldine and Christabel are described â€Å"As a mother with her child† (Coleridge 301). † The void of a mother figure feels as if it may have been filled until the morning she realizes the deceit and understands the sin committed. â€Å"The fact that Christabel’s imputation of sin is self-implicating suggests the latter possibility† (Mulvihill 266).She has realized her own sin has us fully aware of Geraldine’s evil. Her innocence has become experience and she is no longer able to have her purity. The character of Christabel is explained throughout the poem with the use of literary analysis. Christianity, â€Å"the fall of innocence† (Radley 69), and â€Å"the transition from â€Å"innocence† to â€Å"experience† (Harding 40) are portrayed from analysis to show how Christabel is characterized. † Her innocence is ultimately the cause of her downfall in becoming exposed to the world and the sin held within. Her white robe is part of her imitation of innocence and purity, so that initially she seems â€Å"holy† in the same way that she later declares Chri stabel to be. But white is also the color of death: of the shroud and the life-drained complexion† (Chambers 26). Christabel is â€Å"holy† until death tries to take over and take the purity out of her white complexion (Chambers 26). Works Cited Chambers, Jane. â€Å"Coleridge’s CHRISTABEL, Lines48-52. † Explicator 41. 3 (1983): 25. Academic Search Premier. Web. 17 Feb. 2013.Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. â€Å"Christabel. † English Literature. New York: Norton & Company Inc. , 2006. 1634-1649. Print. Harding, Anthony John. â€Å"Mythopoeic Elements In â€Å"Christabel. † Modern Language Quarterly 44. 1 (198): 39-50. Academic Search Premier. Web. 13 Feb. 2013 Mulvihill, James. â€Å"Like A Lady Of A Far Countree†: Coleridge’s â€Å"Christabel† And Fear Of Invasion. † Papers On Language & Literature 44. 3 (2008): 250-275. Academic Search Premier. Web. 15 Feb. 2013 â€Å"Overview: â€Å"christabel†. Gale Online En cyclopedia. Detroit. : Gale, 2013. Literature Resource Center. Web. 17 Feb 2013. Radley, Virginia L. Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Boston: Twayne Publishers, Inc. , 1966. 66-75. Print. Ulmer, William A. â€Å"Christabel And The Origin Of Evil. †Ã‚  Studies In Philology  104. 3 (2007): 376- 407. Academic Search Premier. Web. 15 Feb. 2013. Ulmer, William A. â€Å"Christabel And The Origin Of Evil. †Ã‚  Studies In Philology  104. 3 (2007): 376- 407. Academic Search Premier. Web. 15 Feb. 2013.

The Council of Constance History, Significance, Impact

The Council of Constance (1414 to 1418) was an ecumenical council called by Pope John XXIII at the request of Sigismund, King of the Romans, to resolve the Great Schism, a near century-long split in the Catholic Church that resulted in Rome and the French stronghold of Avignon. A previous 1409 council in Pisa failed to resolve the problem, and by 1414, there were three claimants for the papacy: John XXIII in Pisa, Gregory XII in Rome, and Benedict XIII in Avignon. The council further sought to suppress a reform movement led by Jan Hus. Fast Facts: Council of Constance Description: Meeting of members of the Catholic Church designed to end the Great  Schism, as well as quash an insurgency led by dissident Jan HusKey Participants: Sigismund (King of the Romans), Pope John XXIII, Jan HusStart Date:  November 1414End Date: April 1418Location: Konstanz, Germany A Trap for Foxes On seeing Constance from a high hill, John XXIII was said to have declared that it looked â€Å"like a trap for foxes.† He had been reluctant to call a council at all and was particularly unhappy it was being held in Constance, a lakeside town of about 8,000 people located in the Alps, far from his allies in Italy. But Constance (Konstanz in German) was accessible to delegates from all over Europe and was some distance from the various popes’ key power bases in Italy and France. Constance also boasted a large warehouse that could seat the council, which was comprised of approximately 29 cardinals, 134 abbots, 183 bishops, and 100 doctors of law and divinity. This was the largest such council in the medieval era, and it brought tens of thousands of people to the  small town, including representatives from as far south as Ethiopia and as far east as Russia. Entertainers, merchants, and prostitutes flooded the area to serve the needs of the dignitaries and their entourages.  Ã‚   The official start of the Council was delayed until Christmas Eve,  1414, when Sigismund made a dramatic entry by crossing Lake Constance by boat just in time for midnight mass. Even before the council convened, Sigismund had become convinced that the only way to resolve the issue was to remove all three popes and select a single pope to rule from Rome. He quickly won many council members to his point of view. Three Popes Fall Friends warned John XXIII before he left Italy: â€Å"You may go to Constance a pope, but you will come home a common man. He was the only one of the three popes to make the journey in person, on the slim hope that his presence might earn him good will and allow him to stay in power. But once in Constance, he had a falling out with Sigismund. He was further hobbled by a decision by the Council in February 1415  to vote in blocs as â€Å"nations,† giving delegations like England, which sent about two dozen people, the same power as his hundred or so Italian supporters. Finally, detractors began spreading rumors about his immoral behavior as pope, opening the possibility of the Council excommunicating him and removing him from power. John stalled for time, promising to resign in a statement in early March 1415. Then, on March 20, he disguised himself as a workman and slipped out of the city for the refuge of a supporter in Austria. He was arrested in late April and returned to Constance. He was formally deposed as pope on May 29, and died in captivity on Dec. 22, 1419. Pope Gregory, who many believed had the strongest claim to the papacy, decided not to fight the Council. He resigned on July 4, 1415, and soon retreated to peaceful obscurity. Benedict refused to follow Gregory’s example. Even a summit with Sigismund in the summer of 1417 couldn’t persuade him. The Council finally lost patience, excommunicating him in July of that year and ending over a century of Avignon papacy. Benedict took refuge in the Kingdom of Aragon, which recognized him as pope until his death in 1423. With all three popes removed, the Council formed a conclave and selected Oddone Colonna, who had traveled to Constance with John XXIII and later took part in his removal, as the new and singular pope in November 1417. In honor of his election on St. Martin’s Day, he took the name Martin V and would work towards healing the wounds of the Schism until his death in 1431. The Martyrdom of Jan Hus As the Council worked to resolve the Great  Schism, they also took an aggressive step to quash a growing insurgency out of  Bohemia.   Jan Hus, a Catholic theologian from Bohemia,  had been critical, which sparked  a vocal reform movement. Hus was invited to Constance under a safe-conduct pass from Sigismund in the hopes of resolving the tensions between himself the Church. He arrived in the city on Nov. 3, 1414, and for the next several weeks was able to move around freely. On November 28, he was arrested and imprisoned, following a false rumor  that he was planning to flee. He was held in confinement until trial in early June 1415. During Huss  trial, supporters urged him to recant his beliefs in hopes of saving his life. He insisted that he would recant only if his dissident views were proven to be in error. He told his judges: â€Å"I appeal to Jesus Christ, the only judge who is almighty and completely just. In His hands I plead my cause, not on the basis of false witnesses and erring councils, but on truth and justice. On July 6, 1415, Hus was taken to the cathedral dressed in his priest’s robes. An Italian prelate preached a sermon on heresy and then condemned Hus from the pulpit. Hus was stripped of his robes, and a paper cone inscribed with the word Haeresiarcha (leader of a heretical movement) was put on his head before he was burned at the stake. Aftermath The Council of Constance concluded in April 1418. They had resolved the Great  Schism, but the execution of Hus sparked an uprising among his followers, the Hussites, that lasted for almost 30 years. In 1999, Pope John Paul II expressed his â€Å"deep regret for the cruel death inflicted on Hus† and praised  the reformers â€Å"moral courage.† Resources and Further Reading Stump, Phillip H. The Reforms of the Council of Constance (1414-1418). Brill, 1994.Wylie, James Hamilton. The Council of Constance to the Death of Jan Hus. Longmans, 1914.